Greetings fellow chancetakers,
I recorded a podcast to discuss the research I have done about hip-hop. In this show, I examine different aspects of hip-hop and defend the genre against common critiques. Enjoy!
Hip-*Pop*
.
Wednesday, December 14, 2016
Thursday, December 1, 2016
A Lesson to Learn from Hip-hop
We know Hip-hop is an intriguing genre that often produces
controversial messages. Consider the reason previous generations of people tend
to not like the music; they harken to a time when music seemed more respectable
and innocent. If anything, they will lay claim to a lack of talent in the art
form. This talent argument is made under the assumption that rappers do not
play instruments or compose music, and/or they curse so much because they do
not have a decent vocabulary.
There is a point to be made in these arguments against rap
music, however they are simply reviews of the genre based on personal music
preferences.
With all that said, I must assert that there is indeed as
much to learn from hip-hop as there is to learn from a genre like jazz or classical
music. For example, I insist you will learn about life in the “hood” from rap
or how to put intricate poems together. For this instance, I am referring to
rappers on the radio who are widely considered to be bad at rapping.
If a rapper focuses more on melody than lyrical complexity,
it is assumed he does not have a message in his songs. Or if a rapper always
mentions violence and drugs, he is thought to be dumb or some other type of
extrapolation. I argue that the message of a song does not have to be confined
to the face-value lyrics of a song.
Take 21 Savage, who is often rapping about murder and
selling drugs, robbing, and having sex. What does this say about his character?
If we take it at face value, we would assume he is a psychotic drug dealing
serial killer. With some context, the picture becomes clearer. In interviews
Mr. Savage seems to be a competent person, seemingly normal, aside from the
face tattoos.
Obviously not some maniac. But then what do we make of the
content of the songs? I insist we look at the context of his life to understand
what could cause a man to think these topics are something to brag about. If
all he knows is life from the “hood” where he grew up, what else do you expect
him to speak about? We can assume he has been completely immersed in the
troubling urban culture of Atlanta. His environment is obviously a large inspiration
to his lyrics.
Rather than asking what is wrong with him for speaking about
these topics in such a casual way, we should frame it in the question of the
conditions antecedent to his rapping career. Why is it that his environment
was/is so volatile, so traumatizing that it becomes the only familiar perspective?
In fact, I view hip-hop in total as an ongoing critique of the society it is
produced in.
Sunday, October 30, 2016
How Hip-hop Connects the World
In a slightly different direction
than my initial post, I have decided to focus on what makes hip-hop so
relatable and accessible across different cultures around the world. Different
regions and cultures have varying applications and methods of appreciation for
the art form referred to as hip-hop.
What I find
interesting is the cluster of similar characteristics that hip-hop carries
globally. As explained by Dr. Halifu Osumare from UC Davis, there are a few
levels of accessibility that hip-hop provides for people who may perceive themselves
as outcasts in some way. She refers to these points of relatability as “connective
marginalities;” including class, historical oppression, culture, and youth
rebellion. Just from a glance, it becomes clear how these are clear components
of hip-hop whether it is old or new, familiar or foreign.
Osumare
continues to drive this point home by comparing our beloved American gangsta
rap with gangsta rap from Brazil. This provides a perspective to observe the
marginalities proposed above in a different culture’s interpretation of an
American art form.
From what I
can gather about Racionais MC’s is that they are a Brazilian incarnation of
N.W.A with a slightly less abrasive approach to raising consciousness. With
N.W.A there was often a message, but that message was sometimes layered under
so much description of experience that it may be perceived as glorifying a lifestyle. On the other hand, Racionais MC’s seem to be more focused on
enlightening the public, where N.W.A may have been more focused on shock value.
Though
there are differences between N.W.A and Racionais MC’s, there are also clear
similarities in the context of the connective marginalities that Osumare
suggests are at the core of hip-hop, globally. Racionais MC’s represent those
in a marginal socio-economic class and a historical experience of oppression
simply by hailing from the favelas around Sao Paulo. This can be compared to
the N.W.A.’s representation of Compton, CA. Compton had not been represented by
an influential voice until N.W.A demanded that the world listen.
The other
marginalities are easier to explain without examples. Culture permeates through
global hip-hop the same way it does for skateboarding or rock music.
Ultimately, there are variations to fashion trends and such trivial details,
however, there is consistently an aroma of counter-culture. No hip-hop around
the world is created with the idea of conforming to status quo (of course
individuals will conform to what they believe is cool, we are speaking in terms
of the essence of hip-hop), to be hip-hop is to be original. In the end, youth
tend to feel marginalized and underappreciated by larger society, and they
often are. This sense of counter-culture paired with youth rebellion makes
hip-hop a great tool for teens across the world to get under adults’ skin.
What do you
like about hip-hop? What don’t you relate to in hip-hop? What are the
connections of other music genres in the global arena? Leave a comment below
and let me know what you think!
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
What is a G.O.AT?
In the context of Hip-Hop, there is a popular term that is thrown around anytime some new budding MC gains notoriety in the culture. There are references to various artists being the G.O.A.T, or Greatest Of All Time. But what really makes an artist great? What characteristics constitute an artist's legacy to be considered at the premium level over a span of time? This is a topic I will cover more in depth over the span of this semester, however, I would briefly like to explore this concept right now.
If you are not completely familiar with the competitive nature of Hip-Hop, it essentially developed as a form of poetic dueling when you think about it. As it grew over time, instead of "battling" in person, the contest became more ambiguous and personal. If you were to listen to this genre, following the timeline, you would notice the trend of rappers claiming to be the best, greatest, richest, and so forth.
My concern is over the potential logistics about this never ending competition. Is it possible to create a rubric for the purpose of critiquing a potential G.O.A.T candidate. I assert that it is indeed possible. If we can contend athletes as the G.O.A.T in their sport based on arbitrary statistics. why can't we create arbitrary statistics to keep track of the poets of rap?
Here are a few categories I propose as areas to judge a G.O.A.T candidate:
1. Lyrical Capability- Does the artist display complex, meaningful, or otherwise provoking lyrical capability?
2. Influence- Does the artist have an inarguable influence on the development and maintenance of Hip-Hop culture?
3. Mass Appeal- Does the artist make music that appeals to masses rather than niche fan bases?
4. Album Sales- The hard facts. How many albums actually sold in stores?
5. Innovation- Does the artist display the ability to be original, innovative, or otherwise progressive in the culture of Hip-Hop?
6. Musical Talent- Does the artist play instruments or compose music at an above average level?
7. Work Ethic- Does the artist work exceptionally high in their art, business, or other forms of advancement of Hip-Hop culture?
Leave a comment below and let me know what you think. Who do you think is the G.O.A.T? Is it possible to define? Is there a category missing from my list?
If you are not completely familiar with the competitive nature of Hip-Hop, it essentially developed as a form of poetic dueling when you think about it. As it grew over time, instead of "battling" in person, the contest became more ambiguous and personal. If you were to listen to this genre, following the timeline, you would notice the trend of rappers claiming to be the best, greatest, richest, and so forth.
My concern is over the potential logistics about this never ending competition. Is it possible to create a rubric for the purpose of critiquing a potential G.O.A.T candidate. I assert that it is indeed possible. If we can contend athletes as the G.O.A.T in their sport based on arbitrary statistics. why can't we create arbitrary statistics to keep track of the poets of rap?
Here are a few categories I propose as areas to judge a G.O.A.T candidate:
1. Lyrical Capability- Does the artist display complex, meaningful, or otherwise provoking lyrical capability?
2. Influence- Does the artist have an inarguable influence on the development and maintenance of Hip-Hop culture?
3. Mass Appeal- Does the artist make music that appeals to masses rather than niche fan bases?
4. Album Sales- The hard facts. How many albums actually sold in stores?
5. Innovation- Does the artist display the ability to be original, innovative, or otherwise progressive in the culture of Hip-Hop?
6. Musical Talent- Does the artist play instruments or compose music at an above average level?
7. Work Ethic- Does the artist work exceptionally high in their art, business, or other forms of advancement of Hip-Hop culture?
Leave a comment below and let me know what you think. Who do you think is the G.O.A.T? Is it possible to define? Is there a category missing from my list?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

